Sunday, January 1, 2017

Leviticus Tells Us God Believed Bats were Birds! (Leviticus 11: 13, 19)

It seems that by the time GOD got 
around to writing HIS LEVITICUS 
Book of Law, he needed a
nice long, long rest. 
According to scripture, GOD
thought Bats were Birds.
 Leviticus 11:13, 19 provides HE 
regarded Bats and "other birds as
abominations".
(Also see Deuteronomy 14: 1, 18)
Did GOD have Bats in HIS Belfry?
Was Jehovah of Feeble Mind?
*************************
J.

2 comments:

  1. https://www.flickr.com/photos/37319613@N08/37563860795/sizes/o/

    As you can see from the image above, the layout of the flyers in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 is actually quite logical.

    First, notice that the bat is not placed arbitrarily among the list of the Chordate flyers, but is always placed at the end (Lev 11:19B, Deu 14:18B).

    Also, there are two Phylum of flyers presented in those chapters. According to the Scientific Classification System, the Phylum must precede the class.

    In the King James Version, the word (owph) that is rendered "fowl" is also rendered "flying" (Leviticus 11:21, 23) and "that flieth" (Deuteronomy 14:19).

    Thus, the rendering the word "flyers" instead of "fowl" is justified, and it is so rendered in the Concordant Literal Version (CLV):

    CLV "These you shall regard as abominable among the flyers..." Leviticus 11:13

    The definition from the Strong's Concordance justifies rendering the word "winged".

    You mentioned a "feeble mind". Let's test your logic...

    FACT: the first group of organisms listed in Lev 11:13-19- are members of the CLASS Aves: birds.

    FACT: the last organism listed in Lev 11:-19 is a member of the CLASS Mamalia: the bat.

    FACT: birds are NOT members of the CLASS Mamalia.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT a bird.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the eagle. 11:13.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the ossifrage. 11:13.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the ospray. 11:13.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the vulture. 11:14.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the kite. 11:14.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT every raven. 11:15.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the owl. 11:16.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the night hawk. 11:16.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the cuckow. 11:16.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the hawk. 11:16.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the little owl. 11:17.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the cormorant. 11:17.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the great owl. 11:17.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the swan. 11:18.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the pelican. 11:18.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the gier eagle. 11:18

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the stork. 11:19.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the heron. 11:19.

    CONCLUSION: the bat is NOT the lapwing. 11:19.

    INQUIRY: If Leviticus is Taxonmically UN-reliable, then from the text of Leviticus 11:13-19, and the Scientific Classification System, LOGICALLY CONCLUDE that the bat is a bird...

    Can you do it? It looks like the only one who wants us to the that God believes that a bat is a bird, is you.

    ReplyDelete